"Build me a CRM" works. Breezify will make a reasonable set of decisions on your behalf and hand you back something real and usable. But a first prompt that includes a handful of specific details almost always produces something closer to what you actually wanted, and saves you the refines you would have spent correcting the defaults instead.
The details that help most are concrete, not stylistic. Naming the actual views or pages you need (a pipeline board and a contact list, say, rather than just "a CRM") tells Breezify what to build instead of what to guess. Naming the specific fields that matter to you (deal value, last contacted date, a status like lead or won) beats leaving the data model to be invented from scratch.
Tone and visual direction help too, but a little goes a long way: "warm and editorial" or "crisp and clinical, one accent color" gives Breezify a real design direction to commit to, instead of defaulting to a generic look that then needs several messages of nudging to feel intentional.
One thing that rarely helps: writing a prompt as if it were a formal spec document, with numbered requirements and edge cases spelled out in full. Plain, concrete English (the way you'd describe the app to a coworker who's about to build it) reads better than a requirements list, and it is faster to write besides.
If you are not sure where to start, the template gallery exists exactly for this: pick whichever template is closest to your idea, look at what it actually built, and write your first real prompt as a description of how that differs from what you want instead of starting from nothing.